Grass Roots
Committed to Promoting the Principles of Limited Government, Constitution, Representative Government,
Participatory Republic, Free Market Economy, Family and Separation of Powers

Legislative Updates - 17 February 2014

<< All 2014 updates

Dear Friends:

First, here are some updates on bills mentioned in past GrassRoots updates:

HB33, “Reauthorization of Utah Commission on Service and Volunteerism,” would eliminate the sunset date (currently July 1, 2014) for the sections of Utah Code authorizing the continued existence of the Utah Commission on Service and Volunteerism, thus making this Commission into a more permanent fixture in our government.

HB33 passed the House 58-11 on January 31st, and the Senate 22-1 on February 13th, and awaits consideration by the Governor.

GrassRoots favors a veto of HB33 by the Governor.

HB38Sub2, “Resource Stewardship Amendments,” is substantively the same as HB38Substitute (described last week), except that the new position of state director of resource stewardship would be filled by appointment by the executive director of the Department of Administrative Services—not by appointment by the Governor.

HB38 passed the House Government Operations Committee 8-0 on February 12th (as HB38Substitute) and awaits consideration by the full House (as HB38Sub2).

GrassRoots favors a “no” vote on HB38Sub2 as currently drafted.

HB96, “Utah School Readiness Initiative” would create the School Readiness Special Revenue Fund, and appropriate to this fund $5 million to fund and award grants to certain early childhood education programs.

HB96 passed the House 49-24 on Feb 11th, and awaits consideration by the Senate Education Committee. Senator Bramble is the sponsor of HB96 in the senate.

GrassRoots still favors a “no” vote on HB96.

HB318, “Rights of Parents and Children Amendments” would permit a parent to request a jury trial in a proceeding for termination of parental rights, and would require the court to grant that request.

HB318 awaits consideration by the House Health and Human Services Committee.

GrassRoots still favors a “yes” vote on HB318.

SB128, “Safety Belt Amendments” would have provided, in certain cases, that drivers could be “pulled over” for seat belt violations. (Currently, those over 19 may only be cited for failure to wear a seat belt when being “pulled over” for something else.)

SB128 failed the Senate Transportation, Public Utilities, and Technology Committee 1-2 on February 11th, and is likely dead for this session.

GrassRoots still favors a “no” vote on SB128.

SJR3, “Joint Resolution Regarding Attorney General,” proposes to amend the Utah Constitution to change the office of Attorney General from an elected office to an appointed office, and to provide that the Governor would appoint the Attorney General for a 6-year term from a list of nominees provided by a nominating commission.

SJR3 passed the Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee 6-0, and awaits consideration by the full Senate.

GrassRoots still favors a “no” vote on SJR3.

This week, several bills relating to education and schools in Utah have caught our attention. In our judgment of, and positions on, the following bills, various principles (including the following) have guided our thinking:

  • The traditional family is the fundamental unit of society for the support, teaching, and nurturing of children and other minors. Government should avoid unwarranted interference in the functioning of families and with the prerogatives of parents—including directing the education of their children.
  • Parents are primarily responsible for, and should have control over, the education of their children.
  • Local community control of education is usually better than control by a distant State Board of Education; and is also better than control by a distant national Department of Education.

Here are, in our opinion, the most important education-related bills that have caught our attention:

HB77, “Tax Credit for Home Schooling Parent” sponsored by Representative Lifferth, would provide a nonrefundable tax credit ($500 for each home-schooled child) for a home-schooling parent.

HB77 awaits consideration by House Revenue and Taxation Committee.

When parents decide to home-school their children, thus saving the state the associated schooling expense, it seems appropriate that they get back some or all of the income tax (which all goes to Utah’s Education Fund) that they would otherwise owe. GrassRoots favors a “yes” vote on HB77 as currently drafted.

SB39Substitute, “Home School Amendments” sponsored by Senator Aaron Osmond, would:

  • repeal the requirement that a home-schooling parent annually re-file an affidavit with the school district that his/her school-age child will attend a home school—under SB39, a single affidavit by the parent(s) would “remain in effect as long as: (i) the school-age minor attends a home school; and (ii) the school district where the affidavit was filed remains the school-age minor's district of residence”;
  • repeal the current requirements that “Each minor who attends a home school shall receive instruction: (i) in the subjects the State Board of Education requires to be taught in public schools . . . ; and (ii) for the same length of time as minors are required by law to receive instruction in public schools, as provided by rules of the State Board of Education”—under SB39, the curriculum and instruction time would be governed by the home-schooling parent(s) rather than by the State Board of Education; and
  • specify that the home-schooling parent “assumes sole responsibility for the education of the school-age minor, except to the extent the school-age minor is dually enrolled in a public school.

SB39 passed the Senate Education Committee 5-0 on February 14th, and awaits consideration by the full Senate.

SB39 would be a welcome step in the direction of respecting parents (not the State Board of Education) as the ones who are primarily responsible for—and have the natural right of directing—the education of their children. As currently drafted, GrassRoots favors a “yes” vote on SB39.

SB43, “Intergenerational Poverty Interventions in Public Schools” sponsored by Senator Stuart Reid, would:

  • create the Intergenerational Poverty Interventions Grant Program to fund educational opportunities, outside of the regular school day offerings, for students affected by intergenerational poverty;
  • require the State Board of Education to: a) solicit proposals from school districts and charter schools to receive money under the program; and b) award grants to school districts and charter schools based on certain criteria; and
  • appropriate to the State Board of Education — Utah State Office of Education — Initiative Programs, $5 million.

"Intergenerational poverty" is already defined in Utah Code as “poverty in which two or more successive generations of a family continue in the cycle of poverty and government dependence.”

SB43 passed Senate Education Committee 7-0 on February 10th, and awaits consideration by the full Senate.

SB43 proposes to create another education welfare program to be administered by the (distant) State Board of Education, with money from taxpayers. Most would probably agree that intergenerational poverty is a serious problem. But it would be much better to reduce the size of the welfare state (and, over time, eliminate it), and reduce taxes, thus leaving private individuals, families, and associations, and local communities with greater resources to deal with the variety of problems that exist. GrassRoots favors a “no” vote on SB43.

SB103Substitute, “Local Control of Classroom Time Requirements” sponsored by Senator Osmond and Representative Bird, would:

  • allow a local school board or charter school governing board, subject to the approval of 2/3 of the board members voting, to reallocate up to 60 instructional hours or 8 school days to teacher preparation time or teacher professional development; and
  • provide that the reallocated hours or days are considered part of the school term that is required for the Minimum School Program.

SB103Substitute passed the Senate 21-6 on February 6th, and awaits consideration by the House Education Committee.

SB103 would be a small but welcome step in the direction of local control of education. GrassRoots favors a “yes” vote on SB103Substitute as currently drafted.

SB107, “Math Literacy — Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Initiative” sponsored by Senator Urquhart, would:

  • require the State Board of Education to select one or more technology providers, through a request for proposals process, to provide an interactive web-based program for math literacy and assessment for students in kindergarten through grade 6 (program);
  • provide for the distribution of programs among school districts and charter schools; and
  • appropriate in fiscal year 2015 to the State Board of Education from the Education Fund, $5 million.

SB107 awaits consideration by the Senate Education Committee.

SB107 amounts to more money and more power going to the State Board of Education. A $5 million tax cut would be more appropriate, and would allow individuals to spend or invest as they judge best, rather than putting that decision in the hands of the (distant) State Board of Education. GrassRoots favors a “no” vote on SB107.

SB118Substitute, “School Funding Through Income Tax Revisions” sponsored by Senator Patricia Jones and Representative Arent, would:

  • modify the taxpayer tax credit calculation by limiting the number of personal exemptions—the fiscal note for SB118 indicates that this change is expected to increase tax revenues by $267 million in fiscal year 2015 and by $279 million in fiscal year 2016;
  • appropriate in fiscal year 2015 from the Education Fund to Related to Basic Program (specifically, the School-Level Funding Program), $267 million;
  • create the School-Level Funding Program in which money is allocated to public schools for the implementation of school improvement plans;
  • specify that “(2)(a) A school district . . . shall use funds allocated to a school through the School-Level Funding Program to supplement, not supplant, other state, federal, or local funds that would otherwise be made available for the school's educational programs. (b) The State Board of Education may eliminate or reduce a school's allocation of funds provided through the School-Level Funding Program if the State Board of Education finds the school district . . . is in violation of Subsection (2)(a) or rules enacted by the State Board of Education. . . .”—this language seems to indicate that a local school board could get in trouble, and lose some or all of its funding under the School-Level Funding Program if it cuts taxes, or otherwise is found to violate State Board of Education rules—indeed SB118 allows the State Board of Education to make rules to “prohibit a school district or public school from using School-Level Funding Program money to supplant other state, federal, or local funds that would otherwise be available for a school's educational programs”; and
  • modify requirements pertaining to a school improvement plan by specifying that “Each school improvement plan shall: . . . (d) specify actions that school leadership will take to improve student achievement; (e) specify what actions will be implemented to ensure that high quality instruction is delivered to all students; (f) describe how assessments will be used to inform instruction; (g) describe how targeted interventions will be implemented to meet individual student needs; (h) specify what actions will be taken to ensure that professional development results in improved student achievement. . . .

SB118Substitute passed the Senate Education Committee 4-2 on February 10th.

SB118 would create the School-Level Funding Program, and would significantly (to the tune of about $270 million per year) increase taxes and spending to pay for it. SB118 would also create additional mandates, for local schools and school districts, that are to be enforced by the State Board of Education. Thus SB118 would significantly move control away from private individuals, families, and communities, and toward the State Board of Education. GrassRoots favors a “no” vote on SB118.

If you have any questions about GrassRoots’ position on these bills, or related matters, please contact either of us or any other member of the Board of Utah GrassRoots.

Sincerely,

Steve Stromness
Board Member, Bill Review Coordinator, GrassRoots

Don Guymon
President, GrassRoots

PS Do you want to contact a legislator? Go to le.state.gov and click on “Legislators”.

Do you want to read and follow legislation yourself? Go to le.state.gov and click on “2014 General Session Page” then click on “Numbered Bills”.

Do you have other questions about how to effectively participate in the political process? Please contact us, and we will try to help as appropriate.

Do you have friends that would appreciate this legislative update? Please feel free to forward it to them.


Website management by Doran Barton. Design by Doran Barton & David Baker